May 9, 2009

EMR Adoption Higher When Fewer Privacy Laws Exist

Written by: John
Sign up to receive all the latest EMR and EHR Updates.

Everyone knows that HIPAA rules the privacy world of healthcare.  However, each state actually has their own laws governing the privacy of patient data and in particular data stored in an EMR.  I recently came across an interesting study talking about how those states which have fewer privacy laws for patient data actually have higher EMR adoption rates.  Here’s a short section from the article:

State laws in place to protect patients’ confidentiality may be causing some hospitals to be more skittish about adopting electronic medical records systems, a factor that could impede the push for the industry to go paperless, a study says.

Researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the University of Virginia recently concluded that state privacy regulations reduce aggregate EMR adoption by between 20% and 30%. States that got rid of some of their regulations experienced a 21% gain in hospital EMR adoption rates around the years the laws changed compared with just an 11% gain in states that kept them intact, said the study.

This is really interesting, because I would have initially just called privacy laws an excuse. However, if this study holds true, then it’s more than just an excuse for why EMR adoption is low. Granted, it’s just one of many that people are using. I also think it’s worth noting that this is talking about EMR adoption in hospitals. I’m not sure most small doctors’ offices really pay enough attention to HIPAA and privacy rules for it to affect their adoption of EMR.

Related posts:

  1. EMR US Adoption Rates
  2. Balancing Privacy and Security with Patient Care
  3. One EMR Vendor’s Take on EHR Adoption and Government Intervention
  4. Survey on Impact of EHR Adoption and EHR Implementation
  5. Looking at Slow EMR Adoption

  • Tags:

    Look for similar articles under these categories: 

    2 responses to "EMR Adoption Higher When Fewer Privacy Laws Exist"

    1. # D. Kellus Pruitt DDS commented on May 10th, 2009:

      “I’m not sure most small doctors’ offices really pay enough attention to HIPAA and privacy rules for it to affect their adoption of EMR.” The author nailed it right there.

      As a dentist, EHRs simply have nothing worthwhile to offer my practice. They are expensive and dangerous. Who needs that? D. Kellus Pruitt DDS

    2. # John commented on May 11th, 2009:

      I would disagree with you on one point. EHR can offer a lot of great things to a practice. Just depends on how well they’re implemented.

      My theory is that a well run practice will really benefit from what will become a well implemented EHR. A poorly run practice will just have their problems exacerbated when they implement an EHR.

    Leave a Reply
    Commenting policy: Some comments run the risk of being deleted. These include comments that are spam or cannot be understood or are rude.
    You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
  • Simplify MD EMR

    EMR Selection Book

  • Top - Home