The following questions have been bothering me, and I don’t have answers. Maybe readers will be able to fill me in.
As far as I know, pharmaceutical companies haven’t been subsidizing or providing EMR software to medical practices, though I can’t imagine a better opportunity to a) form even closer ties with medical practices and b) get their message in front of physicians every day.
Attorneys, if you’re reading these, feel free to chime in and let me know if I’m not up to date; I realize laws governing donations to physicians are a moving target. But assuming it’s still legal, I can’t see why pharmas haven’t jumped all over this idea.
I don’t know enough about pharma marketing costs to hazard a guess on what this strategy would generate financially, but I can only imagine it would be a winner.
Another stumper: why aren’t health plans investing in EMRs for their physicians on a large scale?
Not only would EMRs potentially improve efficiency and lower costs, they’d also give the plans an opportunity to build in real-time claims processing. That’s a huge win for both doctors and plans. From what I’ve read, health plans could save billions in paper transaction costs alone if they could use EMRs as a platform to connect processing directly.
As I see it, both of these industries have even better reasons to push EMR adoption than hospitals. Sure, hospitals need to connect with doctors, build loyalty and coordinate care, but the financial upside seems much larger — and more measurable — for pharmas and health plans.
So, this one’s on you, readers. Why aren’t these other stakeholders getting into the game? Hell, why aren’t employers taking a stand? (PHR efforts like Dossia don’t count in my view.) Am I missing something here?