I’ve written more posts than most about doctors and the EMRs they love to hate. But too often, observers like myself are forced to share stats from research organizations or (potentially suspect) ratings by groups like KLAS that poll doctors. Not only are stats a bit sterile, they gloss over some of the idiosyncratic issues doctors face when they take on an EMR.
This time, I had the pleasure of a heart to heart with an ED physician. I got more out of our brief conversation than I have in months of writing up survey “results” from interested parties.
The physician, a left-coaster who works with a large non-profit chain, spent a bit of his time telling me about his experiences with his EHR, which is installed in hospitals where he works.
His conclusion: his EHR deserves the “Certified Nightmare” nickname it’s won among the medical staff. From what he says, the EHR installation he’s dealing is way too hard to use. To him, the user interface imposes a nasty “click burden” that slows him down needlessly.
Before you leap to the conclusion that he’s a Luddite, know that our friendly ED doc is completely paperless at home and that this EHR isn’t his first EHR. He’s actually pretty fluent with technical stuff.
So I have to believe him when he says that the EMRs he’s looked at are clumsy as heck. “The height of EMR design seems to be Microsoft Outlook 2003,” he says. I wish he was wrong!