Today, I logged into Twitter and what did I behold but this sweet little tweet by a health it strategist:
My first thought was “cue the sitcom laugh track” and my responding RT included a hearty”LOL!!” Another retweeter said they’d think they were reading a parody by the famously snarky humor mag The Onion.
But hold on, here. Maybe Bob’s question can yield some useful responses that go beyond cynicism and humor. I’d like to lay out a few features of the health system the question envisions. This will be just a beginning — I’m sure many of you could outdo me by several orders of magnitude — but let’s get started.
Here’s just a few details of future history of the U.S. health IT system, as I’d prefer it to be. Tag, it’s your turn!
– Health IT in the U.S. is accessible to every stakeholder (patient, clinician, researcher, others as needed)
– Health IT devices make it simpler, or easy, for every stakeholder to create a feedback loop in which add information, get relevant feedback and respond to that feedback
– Health IT is used to make healthcare collaborative
– Health IT tracks health status efficiently and plays a direct role in improving outcomes
– Health IT takes advantage of the best of consumer technology design (as it has already begun to do in the mobile sphere), for both personal useability and tools for aggregating data
— The health IT tools professionals use do more to encourage development of products and services that bear t he end user in mind (i.e. the end user isn’t a second thought or an obstacle to work around)
– Health IT vendors work together across a highly compatible standard (similar to say, 802.11n in the wireless world) which puts the issue of walled gardens to bed permanently
– Health IT vendors are rated on interoperability with the unified standard that governs the U.S. EMR world
– U.S. health IT is interoperable with EMRs in other countries