Free EMR Newsletter Want to receive the latest news on EMR, Meaningful Use, ARRA and Healthcare IT sent straight to your email? Join thousands of healthcare pros who subscribe to EMR and EHR for FREE!

Healthcare Doesn’t Do Big Data Yet…It Does BI

Posted on April 15, 2013 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

It seems like healthcare big data is the topic du jour lately. Everyone seems interested in how they can tap into the big data in healthcare. I’m not sure what’s caused the flood of healthcare big data people. I expect that some of it comes from the rush of EHR implementations that have happened thanks in large part to the EHR incentive money. I imagine there’s a whole group of hospital CIO’s that are wondering how they can leverage all of that EHR data to benefit their institution and patients.

I think it’s great that healthcare has finally seemed to realize that there’s a lot of value found in healthcare data. The problem is that in every other industry, what we call healthcare big data isn’t very big data at all. In fact, most other industries would describe most of the healthcare data efforts as pretty simple business intelligence. Yes, there are pockets of exceptions, but most of the data initiatives I’ve seen in healthcare don’t even approach the true meaning of the words big data.

I’m not saying that there’s anything wrong with this. In fact, I loved when I met with Encore Health Resources and they embraced the idea of “skinny” healthcare data. Maybe it was a way for them to market their product a little different, but regardless of their intent they’re right that we’re still working on skinny data in healthcare. I’d much rather see a bunch of meaningful skinny data projects than a true healthcare big data project that had no results.

Plus, I think this highlights the extraordinary opportunity that’s available to healthcare when it comes to data. If all we’re doing with healthcare data is BI, then that means there is still a wide open ocean of opportunity available for true big data efforts.

I think the biggest challenges we face is around data standards and data liquidity. Related to data standards is the quality of the data, but a standard can often help improve the data quality. Plus, the standard can help to make the data more liquid as well.

Yes, I’m sure the healthcare privacy experts are ready to raise the red flag of privacy when I talk about healthcare data liquidity. However, data liquidity and privacy can both be accomplished. Just give it time and wait for the healthcare data revolution to happen.

Who’s Seen My Medical Record? Better Be Able To Answer

Posted on June 19, 2011 I Written By

Katherine Rourke is a healthcare journalist who has written about the industry for 30 years. Her work has appeared in all of the leading healthcare industry publications, and she's served as editor in chief of several healthcare B2B sites.

Right now, HHS is considering a new rule which would demand that hospitals, medical practices and health plans provide anyone who asks with a list of who has accessed their electronic medical records.

The proposed rule, which will go into effect January 2013 if approved, shouldn’t be a big deal in theory. After all, since 2005 healthcare companies directly involved in patient care have had to keep their own log of who accesses patient records electronically.  But apparently, the industry is arguing that providing a report on who saw your EMR file would be a massive hassle. (Even the rule’s author told USA Today that “the burden could be significant.”)

OK, I’m beginning to get a bit of a headache. Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t such monitoring — a detailed record of who looked at what record — a completely standard security measure for any organization with its act together?

I’m also wondering why the heck the article suggests that it would be difficult to get such access logs across departments. Again, I’m not an IT executive and I don’t play one on TV, but how much would EMR security be worth if you could only track access department by department?

I’ll admit that the more paper that remains in the process, the trickier things get. If a consumer wanted a complete list of who’d accessed their files, and the healthcare organization still conducted some major processes on paper, things could get pretty time-consuming. (Though even in that case, healthcare organizations better be aware of who’s peeked at what patient’s data.)

Still, I detect a smokescreen here. While there are probably entities — notably smaller practices with lower-end EMRs in place — that would be burdened by this requirement, many more would probably find it no trouble to handle if they tried. In fact, if a provider has spent big bucks on an EMR that can’t dig up access records easily, they should get their multi-million-dollar investment back.

I understand health plans’ and hospitals’ reluctance to turn over such information, which could drag them into lawsuits, divorces (“Did my wife really have the right to see my records?”) and medical ID theft prosecutions, to name just a few possibilities.  Once targeted, the entity would have to prove, sometimes laboriously, why a given person actually did have good reason to access a certain patient record, and sometimes they’d look bad even if they were in the right.

But if that’s the real issue, and I strongly suspect it is, I’d prefer to see health plans and providers come out and admit that they don’t want to get dragged into fights they may not win. Saying they can’t afford to comply with what should be a simple request just makes them look dishonest. And that can only lead to further headaches down the road.