Free EMR Newsletter Want to receive the latest news on EMR, Meaningful Use, ARRA and Healthcare IT sent straight to your email? Join thousands of healthcare pros who subscribe to EMR and EHR for FREE!

How Does Age Impact Patient Satisfaction?

Posted on September 13, 2017 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of and John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

The following is a guest blog post by Jim Higgins, Founder & CEO at Solutionreach. You can follow him on twitter: @higgs77

If you walked into the average medical practice on any given day, you would see patients ranging in age from 1 to 101. Understanding and adapting to the needs of such a diverse group of patients is challenging. Many offices are struggling with this, and patient dissatisfaction is at an all-time high.

In the Patient-Provider Relationship Study, recently commissioned by Solutionreach, researchers found that one in three patients are likely to switch practices within the next couple of years.

The question is why. What is happening to patient loyalty? And more importantly—what can medical offices do to stem the tide?

In addition to studying patient switching preferences, the study also examined the dynamics of generational satisfaction and preferences, posing the following questions:

  • What impact does age have on patient satisfaction and retention?
  • What role does it play in patient loyalty?
  • Which services create satisfaction for the different generations?

A Closer Look at How Age Impacts Patient Satisfaction

To better understand how age impacts patient retention, it is important to take a closer look at the results from each of the key age groups.

  1. Millennials—Satisfaction levels among the youngest cohort were dismal. Millennials are the least satisfied with all aspects of the practice, including the doctor, office team, and practice logistics. In fact, a stunning 81 percent say that they are not completely satisfied with their medical office. Unsurprisingly, millennials are also extremely likely to switch practices in the upcoming years. Nearly half—46 percent—of millennials say they will probably move on to a new medical practice in the next couple of years.
  2. Gen X—The satisfaction levels of Gen Xers lies somewhere between millennials and boomers. The numbers are still concerning, however. Two out of three Gen Xers are not satisfied with their medical office. Around 35 percent say they will probably change practices in the near future.
  3. Baby Boomers—While millennials are three times more likely to switch providers than boomers, there are still a significant number of unhappy patients in this demographic. Nearly 60 percent of boomers are not completely satisfied with their medical office and one in five will switch practices in the near future.

Regardless Of Age—Technology Boosts Patient Satisfaction

It’s easy to assume that everyone who moves on to a new practice does so because they move or change insurance providers. The truth is a growing number are switching for other reasons.

Why are they so dissatisfied?

Picture the average patient in your mind. What characteristics about them have changed over the past few decades?

The biggest thing is that we have become unbelievably attached to technology—it’s rare to find any of us without either a phone, tablet, or computer. We use technology for virtually everything.

This is the area in which medical practices are struggling to keep up. Solutionreach’s study found that this is the exact category in which patients are least satisfied with their medical office. This is true regardless of age. Millennials, Gen Xers, and baby boomers all want more technology.

The biggest gap between what patients want and what medical practices offer is around texting. Texting has been the most used form of communication for over a decade now, but according to the survey less than 30 percent of practices offer any texting options. Today, every office should be able to:

  • Send a text—94 percent of millennials and 87 percent of Gen Xers want to receive texts from your office. But it’s not just the “youngsters.” Two out of three baby boomers also want you to text them.
  • Receive a text—While some offices have started sending out reminder texts, far fewer actually have the ability to have a patient initiate text messaging through the office number. Eighty-seven percent of millennials and seventy-nine percent of Gen Xers say that they want to be able to text their doctor. Once again, boomers are also on board—58 percent say they want to send a text to their medical practice.

Today’s patient lives are completely intertwined with technology. Medical practices will need to adapt to using technology in new ways to connect with patients or risk losing one in three patients in the coming two years.

Solutionreach is a proud sponsor of Healthcare Scene. As the leading provider of patient relationship management solutions, Solutionreach is dedicated to helping practices improve the patient experience while saving time for providers and staff. Learn more about the Patient-Provider relationship survey here.

Patients Frustrated with Poor Practice Logistics

Posted on August 9, 2017 I Written By

The following is a guest blog post by Jim Higgins, Founder & CEO at Solutionreach. You can follow him on twitter: @higgs77

A new study shows that patients have just about had it with poor practice logistics—things like communication, scheduling, and accessibility. There have certainly been signs this was coming for quite some time, but now the data shows patients really are getting fed up with not having some of the same basic tools they have in service and retail interactions.

The Patient-Provider Relationship Study, which was conducted by Solutionreach, surveyed over 2,000 patients about their recent experiences with different types of providers. Over 500 of those who responded had seen a primary care provider in the past year and were asked questions about that interaction. The questions focused on satisfaction with the provider, their staff, and the practice in general as well as likelihood of switching providers and preferences around communication and accessibility.

The results were pretty stunning. Only 35 percent of patients were completely satisfied with their primary care provider and thirty-four percent of patients said they were considering switching primary care providers in the next couple of years. In addition, 12 percent had switched in the past year. And, quite a few left for reasons other than things like changing insurance or moving. Just under 40 percent of those who had switched said they left because of customer service and experience issues. The problems they listed included:

  • Feeling more like a number than a person
  • Trouble getting appointments
  • Poor communication with/from the staff
  • The staff were not friendly
  • Not satisfied with the staff (other than the provider)

These are very fixable issues. We’re talking almost entirely about the personal perceptions of patients about their interactions with staff, with just a couple exceptions. And those exceptions have largely to do with communication and access, which are also pretty manageable things to change.

You can improve communication and appointment scheduling, and with the right technology, you can do it in a way that feels more personal as well. Not surprisingly many patients want to schedule appointments online and they want options for email and text for communications like reminders. In fact, 79 percent of patients said they wanted text messages from their primary care providers.

It’s important to note that these things don’t just improve the patient experience outside the practice, they save time for staff, which means a better experience when patients are in the practice. So why are providers so hesitant to invest in tools that can fix this problem?

To some degree, it appears to be about fears that these investments won’t pay off—in added reimbursement or return on investment (ROI) from savings. In a study conducted by HIMSS in 2015, providers cited time constraints and lack of reimbursement as barriers to improving patient engagement. The truth is many of the things that fall under “engagement” can also be seen as “customer service,” and patients want better customer service. In another study conducted by MicKinsey, patients said they had similar expectations of service from healthcare providers and non-healthcare companies.

While there will never be added reimbursement for smiling or greeting patients by name, there are some clear areas of ROI that can make up for that. Email and text reminders have been shown to reduce no-shows by 30 to 50 percent, saving the average primary care practice about $40,000 a year. Online appointment scheduling not only saves the practice on scheduling calls, which generally take four to eight minutes, but it can also help patients find earlier appointments, shortening wait times.

For providers who worry that texting with patients will suck up more time with no reimbursement, there is hope as well. Texts take only about four seconds on average while the average call is more like two or more. Also, texts can be responded to at the convenience of providers and staff. There is no need to play phone tag, which is a waste of time for everyone.

When it comes to reimbursement for engagement and service activities, it’s time to think bigger picture. Reimbursement can be time saved. It can be patients retained. It can be increased compliance or fewer phone calls. There are a lot of ways a better patient experience can translate into a better bottom line.

Solutionreach is a proud sponsor of Healthcare Scene. As the leading provider of patient relationship management solutions, Solutionreach is dedicated to helping practices improve the patient experience while saving time for providers and staff. Learn more about the Patient-Provider relationship survey here.

Clinical Insights from Social Media Data: Amplifying Patient Voice with Symplur

Posted on May 31, 2017 I Written By

Healthcare as a Human Right. Physician Suicide Loss Survivor. Janae writes about Artificial Intelligence, Virtual Reality, Data Analytics, Engagement and Investing in Healthcare. twitter: @coherencemed

What data from social media can help healthcare organizations?

One of the biggest challenges of online and social data is the sheer volume of unstructured data. Can your physician read all your tweets and postings? Hopefully not. Physicians have data and work overload, a daily report of steps taken from activity trackers or online social media use hurts their ability to treat patients. HealthIT solutions can help process this data and find patterns and changes.

I had a conversation with Audun Utengen about actionable insights into healthcare from his company, Symplur. At Datapalooza he participated in a panel and mentioned the rich amount of patient data that can be found on twitter (shocked gasp followed by a furrowed brow). Symplur signals tracks online engagement.  You can find healthcare insights from conversations really quickly. They provide tools that help healthcare providers get patient insights where they are naturally interacting. There is value in meeting patients where they are, and patients are discussing their healthcare online.

Originally, the assumption was that patients would not say things online. Sensitive topics do not naturally show up in social media use- fewer people are discussing gonorrhea online than receive treatment for gonorrhea. Providers assumed that things which are protected patient information would not show up on twitter. They were wrong. As most social media users know- it’s shocking what people will post online. Not every aspect of health is on twitter but patients want to engage online.  They go to twitter because they want their voices to be heard. They want things to change. They can’t be ignored on twitter. They want their voices to be heard by people in decision-making positions.

Patient’s online discussion have positive impacts on organizations. The key is to be proactive about patient engagement online. Stanford did a study looking about patients’ engagement at conferences. Typically, you will find 1 patient in the top 1 percent of influencers. While this number is low, conferences which have a higher percentage of patients active as top influencers have a greater reach. Want to increase your Healthcare voice and conference audience? Engage patient advocates online. Engaging patients is commercially valuable in amplification. Future patients get more insight as well.  Audun Utengen and I looked at the data from Datapalooza and found that 11 of the top 100 influencers were patients.  That is way ahead of the median number for all healthcare conferences- in 2016 the average number of top influencers that were patients at a conference was one.

“They did a great job giving patients a voice at the conference. I am impressed.”

-Audun Utengen, Co-Founder of Symplur

Healthcare Stakeholder breakdown of the top 100 influencers ranked by the Healthcare Social Graph Score.

Datapalooza had a higher than average reach and a unique blend of participants. Audun Utengen described some of the unique features of the conference:

“The social conversation from the conference was very dynamic. From the 9,366 tweets, 80% included at least one mention. Lot’s of connections were made and we witnessed the typical “flattening of healthcare” that social media is known for by breaking down the barriers between the stakeholder groups. Below is a network analysis graph showing the flattening and the conversational patterns between Twitter account and their healthcare stakeholder groupings.”

Conversations blend between different stakeholders in the healthcare conversation at Datapalooza

The ability for many stakeholders to access information and interact with each other in one place is one of the advantages of twitter. Using hashtags can help stakeholders learn about content about a specific topic quickly. One of the things Symplur is allows is the visualization of keywords surrounding conversations on twitter. When looking at the conversations from Datapalooza the topic of “patients” was very high. Unsurprisingly, “data” is the topic of focus. Patient, Health and Patients rounded out the top conversation topics.

Keyword Frequency Analysis Graph

Symplur Signals have been used for over 200 healthcare studies. They partner with academic research centers seeking more information from online conversations. Companies can also look at competitors in their area and see how they compare. Does a nearby provider have more positive mentions on social media?

Data from online interactions can also give insights into patient health. Social usage has unique implications for mental health. Frequently, online behavior change can predict mental health change. Pediatricians and Providers are in a position to see online behavior in their area and help families understand the implications. If bullying is a problem in your area providers can know their patients will have higher stress levels and provide resources and support. Certain behaviors and even emojis indicate a higher risk of depression. A suicide that will predictably happen based on social data will not show up in clinical records. Listening to what patients want us to hear will help provide greater support.

The sheer volume of social data can mask its usefulness. Online activity and data can be difficult to process for many clinicians. In a world of ever-increasing data and patients reporting everything from steps taken a day to now online behavior many providers have data overload. Data insight tools such as Symplur filter data into a format that allows physicians and systems to use it to improve patient outcomes.

I Really Don’t Want to Be Your “Worst” Patient

Posted on April 29, 2016 I Written By

The following is a guest blog post by M. Maxwell Stroud, Lead Consultant at Galen Healthcare Solutions.
Max - Healthcare IT
“I really don’t want to be your “worst” patient. Really, I don’t.”  These are the words that I think to myself as I prepare to ask my new specialist if he has interfaces with either of the hospital labs in my hometown 40 miles away.  My provider humors me and lets me know that if I go to one lab he will get a fax, and another and he will be able to view the results in a portal.  Sigh.

I have for a long time kept all of my care to one healthcare organization in town – in part because I am a firm believer in one chart for one person and I personally don’t want to have to deal with the mess of coordinating all of my records or manually schlepping things from office to office.  I love the concept of “one source of truth” and I know how far away we really are from that.  So why venture out of town and (gasp) to different healthcare organization?  Because that is where the best specialist was that was seeing new patients and mine had left town.

As a patient, I get to make that choice.  I get to decide where I get my care – as I should.  I also make the choice knowing that it will result in me having two distinct medical records in orgs 40 miles away from each other.  I also know that it means I am, at times, going to have to put on my advocacy hat and make sure that my records are correct, that my labs got where they need to go and that everyone has the information that they need so that I can get the best care.

Wait. What?  The patient is the only person in this continuum of care who is making sure the right person has the right data at the right time?  Yep.  Some might say that I am a control freak or that I need to relax a little – but I am informed by the life experiences of the patients that have been a part of my life.  I have seen what happened when my father got admitted to the hospital without an accurate medlist available.  I have seen the binder that my sister has to carry with her on the train that has her MRIs and PET scans to take to her next oncology appointment in the city.

It blows my mind that just a little over a month ago I was at the largest healthcare IT conference in the country (HIMSS16) discussing interoperability, and now I am on the phone with the nurse at the clinic because she cannot find my lab results … “Oh wait” she says “they are in the print and scan pile.”  Great.  Just great.

I have heard the argument that patients are not interested in their data.  There is a chance I could be an outlier – I live my life in a world of health data and I am acutely aware of how it is used in my care and the care of others.  I really think the truth is you don’t know how important it is to you until it becomes important to you.  One life event, one family member’s crisis, one rare diagnosis – and you begin to understand that you are the most important person in your own healthcare.

We have centered record keeping around the physical location of care.  This makes sense when you think historically.  Patients used to be less mobile, receive care locally and lived locally.  Additionally, the role of the “legal medical record” is a legal representation of the care provided and decisions made by a healthcare organization.  Organizations still need to document medical decision making, but patients are becoming more and more mobile.  People move from city to city, or even within health networks in the same town.  In the digital age, even if the legal medical record lives with the provider —  the data needs to follow the patient.

We can do better by patients and consumers.  The information is there, it is just not yet connected in the way that will make it available, actionable and meaningful to everyone who needs it.  It’s not just about finding an easy button to import discrete data, but also a culture change.  Truly putting the patient at the center of the data is simultaneously mission critical and more than a little revolutionary.

About M. Maxwell Stroud
M. Maxwell Stroud, MSW MSW is a Lead Consultant at Galen Healthcare Solutions with a professional background in both healthcare and social work. Max has been consulting in Health IT for over 8 years.  She has worked with every aspect of health IT in ambulatory care including facilitating clinics through the transition from paper to electronic formats, supporting teams through major system-wide upgrades as well as add-on implementations and integration projects.       Max has a passion for collaborative process and building processes that bring all stakeholders to the table to build systems that meet the needs of the business organization, the providers and the patients.  Max can be found on Twitter at @MMaxwellStroud

Lessons Learned from Patient Engagement Efforts in Louisiana

Posted on March 28, 2016 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of and John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

UPDATE: Check out the video recording of our interview:

2016 March - Lessons Learned from Patient Engagement Efforts in Louisiana-blog

For our next Healthcare Scene interview, we’ll be chatting with Jamie Martin and Linda Morgan from the Louisiana Health Care Quality Forum (LHCQF) on Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at Noon ET (9 AM PT). After putting on an incredible session on patient engagement at HIMSS, I can’t wait to have LHCQF join me to share many of the experiences and learnings that have taken place in their efforts to promote patient engagement in Louisiana.

You can join my live conversation with Jamie Martin and Linda Morgan and even add your own comments to the discussion or ask them questions. All you need to do to watch live is visit this blog post on Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at Noon ET (9 AM PT) and watch the video embed at the bottom of the post or you can subscribe to the blab directly. We’re hoping to include as many people in the conversation as possible. The discussion will be recorded as well and available on this post after the interview.

As we usually do with these interviews, we’ll be doing a more formal interview with Jamie Martin and Linda Morgan for the first ~30 minutes of this conversation. Then, we’ll open up the floor for others to ask questions or join us on camera. Jamie, Linda and the team at LHCQF have done some phenomenal work in promoting patient engagement in Louisiana. I’m looking forward to learning from their experience and insights so we can see more of it happen across the nation and world.

If you’d like to see the archives of Healthcare Scene’s past interviews, you can find and subscribe to all of Healthcare Scene’s interviews on YouTube.

Hyperportalotus: Condition Whereby Patient Has Too Many Healthcare Acquired Portals

Posted on March 7, 2016 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of and John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

In case you missed the last day of HIMSS 2016 (which is most of you since the keynote area was pretty empty), you missed a number of interesting keynote sessions and other education sessions. However, as I thought through the sessions that day, this comment from a patient attending one of those sessions really stood out to me:

Based on the reaction of the crowd to this comment and my own experience talking with thousands of doctors and patients, this is a very common problem. Meaningful use encouraged providers to have a patient portal, but this had the unintended side effect of what I’d call portal proliferation.

The patient who commented about her “hyperportalotus” said that she knew that she had portals for most of her providers, but she couldn’t keep track of which provider was on which portal. No doubt she was embarrassed when she couldn’t remember how to log in to that many portals as well. Plus, the last thing any sick person wants to do is go searching through 9 portals to find the one that has the information they need.

What concerns me most about Hyperportalotus is that I don’t think there’s a clear pathway to treating this debilitating problem. There are some treatments that make it better, but the problem still remains and I don’t see a cure for the problem coming anytime soon. Is the government going to come out with a portal non-proliferation treaty? I don’t think so.

Before I get a wave of pitches that you’ve solved this problem, I’ll make it clear that I don’t think the patient being an HIE of one is a scalable solution. That idea might work for some patients, but it won’t work for most. Plus, the complexity of each portal having their own format and design causes so many issues with the concept of the patient being the repository and aggregator of their health information.

I’d love to hear how people think this will play out? We got a bunch of doctors on the portal. Now what?

No,The Patient Isn’t Disrupting Your Workflow!

Posted on February 26, 2016 I Written By

Anne Zieger is veteran healthcare consultant and analyst with 20 years of industry experience. Zieger formerly served as editor-in-chief of and her commentaries have appeared in dozens of international business publications, including Forbes, Business Week and Information Week. She has also contributed content to hundreds of healthcare and health IT organizations, including several Fortune 500 companies. Contact her at @ziegerhealth on Twitter or visit her site at Zieger Healthcare.

Just recently, I had a personal experience which highlighted a serious problem in how hospital staffers handle health IT workflow.

The backstory is as follows. I was dispatched to the emergency department of a local mid-sized community hospital after complaining of chest pain and shortness of breath. (Turned out it was an asthma attack, not a cardiovascular complication, but the on-call doc I spoke with wasn’t taking any chances.)

This hospital ED seems efficient and well-run. Moreover, the clinicians and techs are uniformly attentive, thorough and patient. In other words, I feel safe and well-cared-for there.

That being said, I had a few experiences during this ED visit which I suspect are endemic to the industry. No one of these issues seemed serious in and of themselves, but collectively they gave me the sense that my feedback on what I observed wasn’t welcome.

They included the following:

  • When I called attention to the fact that my blood pressure reading was unusually low (80/60) they dismissed the data as a blip and discouraged further discussion.
  • After the expected EKG to rule out cardiac concerns , staff left the leads attached to my skin to allow further testing if needed. Because the adhesive attaching the leads to my skin came loose now and then, you guessed it, alarms went off. When I suggested that the leads be either reattached or removed, the tech’s response translated to: “Honey, you have no business asking these questions.”
  • When I tried to find the results of the tests they were running via the MyChart app on my phone (yes, they’re an Epic shop), none of them were available, even though the doctors already had them.

None of these issues represent a staggering problem. My blood pressure did normalize, we handled the EKG lead stickiness issue without incident, and I did get my test results as soon as the doctor had them. I got a nebulizer treatment and some feedback on my overall health, and went home feeling much better.

That being said, I still find it unsettling that I was discouraged from taking note of what I saw and heard, and had no access to test results on the spot that would have put many of my concerns to rest.

More broadly, I object strenuously to the “doctor knows best” scenario that played out in this setting, at least where IT workflow was concerned:

  • While I understand completely that nurses and techs are besieged with needless noises and suffer from alarm fatigue, treating my response to those alarms as trivial doesn’t seem appropriate to me.
  • Failing to share data on the spot with me via the portal deprived me of the chance to discuss the data with my ED doctor. Instead, I only got to go over the data very quickly and mechanically with the nurse at discharge.

What bugs me, ultimately, is the intangible sense that I was perceived as a force breaking the IT workflow rather than a participant in it. This incident has convinced me that we need to transform the way HIT systems are designed, in a manner which brings the patient into the process of care. You clinicians need my eyes and ears to be on the case too.

Patient Engagement Distracts the Health Care Field From Reform (Part 1 of 2)

Posted on January 11, 2016 I Written By

Andy Oram is an editor at O'Reilly Media, a highly respected book publisher and technology information provider. An employee of the company since 1992, Andy currently specializes in open source, software engineering, and health IT, but his editorial output has ranged from a legal guide covering intellectual property to a graphic novel about teenage hackers. His articles have appeared often on EMR & EHR and other blogs in the health IT space. Andy also writes often for O'Reilly's Radar site ( and other publications on policy issues related to the Internet and on trends affecting technical innovation and its effects on society. Print publications where his work has appeared include The Economist, Communications of the ACM, Copyright World, the Journal of Information Technology & Politics, Vanguardia Dossier, and Internet Law and Business. Conferences where he has presented talks include O'Reilly's Open Source Convention, FISL (Brazil), FOSDEM, and DebConf.

One can derive a certain sense of entertainment, along with a discomfort comparable to the unending alarms one hears in the background of a hospital ward, when one sees an industry fumble over a critical task and seek desperately for a solution that takes the heat off of them while freeing them from the thoroughgoing cultural and organizational change that the crisis clearly calls for. If you haven’t figured out the issue I’m talking about yet, it’s the hot topic in health care circles these days: patient engagement.

Patient engagement is starkly counterposed to patient empowerment, which is the demand issued by the activists most engaged in health care these days. This article will look at the overlap and differences.

The Elusive Hunt for the Happy Patient
Doctors and administrators must be annoyed at having take time away from busy schedules to learn new bedside manners, but articles pour out on web sites almost daily telling them they need to do so. Typical titles are Social Media 101 For Healthcare CXOs and 5 Elements of a Successful Patient Engagement Strategy. A whole new job description has been even created: the patient experience officer, adding another expensive office to the hospital bureaucracy (with a concomitant rise in hospital costs, I’m sure).

I’ll double back later and admit that many of recommended strategies could help improve care. But an initial indulgence in cynicism is still justified.

Atul Gawande contributed to the fervor for treating patients as customers through his notorious ode to the Cheesecake Factory. The strengths and weaknesses of that comparison have been intelligently analyzed by numerous articles, such as ones in Forbes and KevinMD.

Another commentary shrewdly notes that clinicians themselves suppress patient engagement through problems ranging from lack of record sharing to opaque pricing.

One can sympathize with clinical administrators caught up in the rating frenzy that has overtaken everything we buy and every institution with which we interact. People seem to listen to other people’s rants over long waits or snippy receptionists when choosing which doctor to call (that is, people, lucky enough to have a choice of doctors–a topic beyond the scope of this article). The Department of Health and Human Services has legitimized the concern for patient ratings with its Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey, introduced in 2006. CMS uses a hospital’s score while determining its Medicare pay rate for inpatient care. (There’s help yet again for beleaguered administrators: Five Tips to Improve Your HCAHPS Scores).

OK, patient experience is important. I certainly couldn’t argue against empathy or compassion. One study found that communicating well with patients contributes more than other “quality measures” to reducing hospital readmissions. The critical issue of patient access to records will be addressed in my next section. More minor improvements to the patient experience can have ripple effects–for instance, moving them through the waiting room and examination faster reduces their risk of picking up infections. Even the snippy receptionist contributes to stress that’s bad for health, or discourages a patient from making an important follow-up visit.

But patient experience does not equal good care. As highlighted in an article in the Atlantic Magazine, patients are easily misled by superficial conveniences. Real improvement in care, the article says, comes from more nurses and a better working environment.

If people are dropping right and left from bugs picked up in restaurants (as they did in a number of Chipotle outlets), we wouldn’t be asking customers to rate the foam on their coffees or whether the waiters smiled at them. We’d be instituting a strong restaurant inspection regimen.

That’s the position of our hospitals and clinics. We have much worse things to worry about than the lengths of time spent in the waiting room. But if we want a focus on patients, there’s another way to do it that I’ll discuss in the next segment of the article.

What Does It Take to Create the Ideal Patient Experience? – #MyIdealPtExp

Posted on December 14, 2015 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of and John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

This new world of social media has created so many virtual friends for me. Over time I’ve had a chance to meet so many of them in person. While sometimes it’s a disappointment meeting someone in person, I’ve also had the opposite experience. This happened at RSNA when I got a chance to meet Andy DeLaO (@CancerGeek) in person. I’d always been impressed by his insightful tweets over the years. So, I was blown away when he was even more impressive and insightful in person. I love it when that happens.

One of the most impressive things he showed me was his new effort around what he calls My Ideal Patient Experience. He even had these really cool coins to hand out which was a great way for me to remember his concept:
My Ideal Patient Experience
Andy the team behind My Ideal Patient Experience has gone through the research and defined the patient experience using these 4 pillars:

  • Time
  • Trust
  • Transparency
  • Transitions

However, it’s worth considering the connective tissue between all 4 pillars:

Time Leads To Trust, Trust Leads To Transparency , Transparency Leads To Transitions; The 4t’s Lead To Relationships And Success!

Andy and his team have been at this for a while even though they’re just now getting their official patient experience website launched. I love that they’re even keeping track of their stats:

  • 50,850 Patients Impacted
  • 878 Physicians Engaged
  • 46 Clients Worked With
  • 30 Completed Projects

If you’re looking to improve the way you engage with patients or your patient experience, take a second to look at the consulting, market research, healthcare engagement, and education resources they offer. After my experience finally meeting Andy in person, I’m excited to see the impact for good “My Ideal Patient Experience” will have on healthcare. Plus, I look forward to digging into the concepts even more in the future.