Topic 1: Do you think the healthcare system WANTS 100% interoperability & data liquidity? Why/why not?
T1: My own belief: market drivers for ownership of data will prevent us from achieving true #data liquidity.#HITsm
— Mandi Bishop (@MandiBPro) March 29, 2013
T1: Vendor and patient lock-in is a real phenomenon. Data is a resource that won’t be liquid until there’s more “patient liquidity”. #hitsm
— Leonard Kish (@leonardkish) March 29, 2013
T1 I would think patients would want to keep data away from insurance companies in fear of increased premiums. #HITsm
— Roheet Kakaday (@TheBiopsy) March 29, 2013
RT @danhaley5: @healthstandards #Interoperability is a capability. We need #interoperation – meaning data u want, when … #hitsm
— Leonard Kish (@leonardkish) March 29, 2013
Topic 2: As consumer, what are YOUR fears about your health data being shared across providers/payers/government?
T2 Insurance companies using my data to figure crafty ways of charging me more. That’s my biggest concern. (Oh, data security too) #HITsm
— Roheet Kakaday (@TheBiopsy) March 29, 2013
T2: Fear of unknown, understanding de-identified versus access to identified #EHR, but both can be used for or against patients #hitsm
— Nicholas Magers, RD(@NicholasMagers) March 29, 2013
T2: #Data instability and #privacy are concerns for all consumers, myself included.Also dont want all or nothing- ability to filter #HITsm
— Linda Stotsky (@EMRAnswers) March 29, 2013
T2: Fear about data sharing would be that MY health data is no longer used for MY benefit #HITsm
— Phil Chuang (@PhilipChuang) March 29, 2013
Topic 3: What do you think payers will do with #quantifiedself data if integrated into EHR? Actuarial/underwriting?
T3. offer “discounts”, hopefully, and they’ll figure out what works, much like putting a sensor on your car. #hitsm
— Leonard Kish (@leonardkish) March 29, 2013
T3: I think using self-reported data could be a 2-sided coin. Opportunity for abuse from both sides, including patient. #HITsm
— Chad Johnson (@OchoTex) March 29, 2013
T3: From a payer perspective, #quantifiedself data would be gold if integrated w/ PHR/#EHR – risk scoring, predictive modeling, etc. #HITsm
— Mandi Bishop (@MandiBPro) March 29, 2013
T3: This might be crazy, but couldn’t payers be PROACTIVE leaders in driving health/wellness education using the $ incentive?#HITsm
— Michael A. Gaspar (@MichaelGaspar) March 29, 2013
Topic 4: Could there be a correlation between your fear of data liquidity and your health?
T4: Hypothesis – healthier patients will be less concerned w/ open data. But I could be TOTALLY wrong. 🙂 Discuss! #HITsm
— Mandi Bishop (@MandiBPro) March 29, 2013
T4. Fear of data liquidity is a convenient excuse for not knowing, who doesn’t search for sensitive info on Google? ?#hitsm
— Leonard Kish (@leonardkish) March 29, 2013
T4: fear of data liquidity is lack of education. People don’t know how health data could save lives, but most would want that.#hitsm
— Stephanie Zaremba (@s_zaremba) March 29, 2013
T4: Is it me or are we trying to solve a lot of healthcare problems with healthcare solutions? New sources? #innovation #HITsm
— Michael A. Gaspar (@MichaelGaspar) March 29, 2013
Topic 5: What could assuage your fears? Education? Legislation? Regulation? Healthcare system withdrawal?
T5: PROOF! #HITsm
— Chad Johnson (@OchoTex) March 29, 2013
T5: Google searches are most obvious example. Show me some results! #hitsm
— Leonard Kish (@leonardkish) March 29, 2013
T5: What will assuage our fears?Simplest answer is time.Recall when you wouldn’t use a credit card in the Interweb? #HITsm
— Keith W. Boone (@motorcycle_guy) March 29, 2013
T5: Education is the cure for much. Who educates the educators? My vote: using consumer bizintel to lead from both sides. #HITsm
— Michael A. Gaspar (@MichaelGaspar) March 29, 2013