Free EMR Newsletter Want to receive the latest news on EMR, Meaningful Use, ARRA and Healthcare IT sent straight to your email? Join thousands of healthcare pros who subscribe to EMR and EHR for FREE!

Healthcare Costs and the New Cost Conscious Patient

Posted on June 30, 2015 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

My favorite health economist, Jane Sarasohn-Kahn, has put out a really interesting post on her Health Populi blog talking about what the SCOTUS ACA ruling means for health consumers (Side Note: Here’s the lesson I took from the ruling.). Jane offers an important perspective that we should think about as we look to the future of healthcare. Here’s an excerpt from her article:

There are still tweaks and adjustments to be made to the law, and market supports that must deal with the ever-rising price of health care. While optimists report health care cost increases moderated to 6.5% in 2015, this growth rate is nonetheless many times greater than peoples’ wage increases (relatively stagnant for a decade) and the Consumer Price Index which in the previous year was actually negative (due to lower costs of petrol and other decreasing costs in the household budget). The one cost households can count on going up, up, up is….healthcare.

And so with the growth of high-deductible health plans and health savings accounts, health consumers must become health care shoppers — that is, if people want to gain some control over their financial wellness.

What does this new cost conscious patient mean for healthcare? What systems are we going to need to be able to handle the patient? Will we be able to continue providing care to patients without any real idea on how much that care will cost? Or will we need systems that help us know what the cost of care will be so the patient can choose to buy that care or not? Will cost conscious patients want to be kept well instead of just having their current complaint treated?

There are these and a lot of other questions that are raised by this shift in patient consumption of healthcare services. Understanding these changes is going to be extremely important for healthcare organizations to survive.

Specialty Specific EHR

Posted on June 29, 2015 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

I’ve long been a fan of the specialty specific EHR vendor. I’ve seen over and over again how much of a difference a specialty specific EHR can make in a practice. It’s a slippery slope when a specialty specific EHR starts entering other specialties. We’d like to think that every doctor is the same, but the variation in the needs of different specialties is rarely given the attention it deserves.

What scares me is that if we’re not careful, the specialty specific EHR vendor might be a dying breed. This isn’t because the specialty specific EHR vendors aren’t loved by their users more than the alternatives. Instead it’s the shift towards hospital owned medical practices that puts the specialty specific EHR in danger.

While hospital systems would love to support a best of breed approach to EHR software and allow each specialty to choose their own, I’ve never seen it actually happen. When push comes to shove, the hospital system starts rolling out an EHR vendor that “supports” every one of their specialties. It’s hard to blame an executive for making this choice. The logistics of supporting 20+ EHR vendors is onerous to put it lightly. The efficiency of one EHR vendor for a large multi specialty organization is just impossible to ignore. Long term however, I wonder if the downsides will cause major issues.

I should also declare that I don’t think a specialty specific EHR is always the best option. Some specialty specific EHR software aren’t very good either. In fact, I was recently thinking through the list of medical specialties and there were a lot of specialties where I didn’t know of a specialty specific EHR for them.

The one that struck me the most was that I didn’t know of an OB/GYN specific EHR. Is that really the case? I’ve seen hundreds of EHR and I couldn’t think of ever seeing an OB/GYN specific EHR. Maybe I’ve missed it, and if I have then I’d love to learn about one. I imagine the reason there isn’t one is because many of the larger All in One EHR vendors have put a decent focus on OB/GYN functionality. So, maybe no one wanted to compete with what was out there already? That’s speculation. What’s odd to me though is that OB/GYN seems like the perfect case where a specialty specific EHR could really benefit that specialty. They have some really unique needs and workflows. I’d think there would be massive competition around their specific challenges.

What I’ve also found is even the EHR vendors that are happy to sell to any specialty and probably have a few templates for that specialty (Yes, that’s how many EHR vendors “support” every specialty), even the All In One EHR vendors work better for certain specialties. This is often based on which specialties the EHR vendor had success with first. If 80 of your first 100 EHR sales are to cardiologists, then you can bet that your EHR is going to work better for cardiologists than it will for podiatrists.

With this in mind, let’s work as a community to aggregate a list of specialty specific EHR vendors. I’ll be generous and say that if an EHR vendor works with more than 10 EHR specialties, then it’s not a specialty specific EHR (5 is probably a better number). If you’re an EHR vendor and want to admit which specialties you work better for, then I’d love to hear that too.

Can we find a specialty specific EHR for every medical specialty? I look forward to seeing if we can in the comments.

EMR and EHR Goes Mobile

Posted on June 26, 2015 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

I know. I’m a little late to the party. Ironically I created the first mobile version of EMR and EHR about 3+ years ago, but the options that were available weren’t very good and so I abandoned it and went back to the general theme. Plus, phone sizes got so big that I’ve always felt like most websites could be viewed on a modern smartphone without issue.

The people at Google (who are much smarter than me) have chosen otherwise and have started penalizing websites (in their search ranking) that aren’t mobile optimized. I still don’t think it’s a huge deal for my readers since only 10-15% of them read it on mobile devices and a big portion of that is on an iPad or tablet which is large enough to enjoy the normal website. Plus, an even larger portion of the EMR and EHR readership reads it in their email and that’s optimized for mobile already.

Of course, now that you’ve heard my excuses for why it took so long to create a beautiful mobile version of EMR and EHR, I’m happy to say that I’ve finally bit the bullet and rolled out a nice mobile theme for EMR and EHR. In fact, if you’re reading this post on your mobile device, then you’re experiencing the mobile optimized goodness already.

I’m still working on a few more changes to the mobile version of EMR and EHR, but I think you’ll enjoy reading our great content on your mobile device much better now. Let us know what you think in the comments. We’re happy to hear any problems, suggestions, and any praise (who doesn’t like a little ego stroke?) you have about the new mobile version of the site.

Above all else, thanks so much for reading and all your support!

Some Methods For Improving EMR Alerts

Posted on June 25, 2015 I Written By

Anne Zieger is veteran healthcare consultant and analyst with 20 years of industry experience. Zieger formerly served as editor-in-chief of FierceHealthcare.com and her commentaries have appeared in dozens of international business publications, including Forbes, Business Week and Information Week. She has also contributed content to hundreds of healthcare and health IT organizations, including several Fortune 500 companies. Contact her at @ziegerhealth on Twitter or visit her site at Zieger Healthcare.

A new study appearing in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association has made some points that may turn out to be helpful in designing those pesky but helpful alerts for clinicians.

Making alerts useful and appropriate is no small matter. As we reported on a couple of years ago, even then EMR alert fatigue has become a major source of possible medical errors. In fact, a Pediatrics study published around that time found that clinicians were ignoring or overriding many alerts in an effort to stay focused.

Despite warnings from researchers and important industry voices like The Joint Commission, little has changed since then. But the issue can’t be ignored forever, as it’s a car crash waiting to happen.

The JAMIA study may offer some help, however. While it focuses on making drug-drug interaction warnings more usable, the principles it offers can serve as a model for designing other alerts as well.

For what it’s worth, the strategies I’m about to present came from a DDI Clinical Decision Support conference attended by experts from ONC, health IT vendors, academia and healthcare organizations.

While the experts offered several recommendations applying specifically to DDI alerts, their suggestions for presenting such alerts seem to apply to a wide range of notifications available across virtually all EMRs. These suggestions include:

  • Consistent use of color and visual cues: Like road signs, alerts should come in a limited and predictable variety of colors and styles, and use only color and symbols for which the meaning is clear to all clinicians.
  • Consistent use of terminology and brevity: Alerts should be consistently phrased and use the same terms across platforms. They should also be presented concisely, with minimal text, allowing for larger font sizes to improve readability.
  • Avoid interruptions wherever possible:  Rather than freezing clinician workflow over actions already taken, save interruptive alerts that require action to proceed for the most serious situation. The system should proactively guide decisions to safer alernatives, taking away the need for interruption.

The research also offers input on where and when to display alerts.

Where to display alert information:  The most critical information should be displayed on the alert’s top-level screen, with links to evidence — rather than long text — to back up the alert justification.

When to display alerts: The group concluded that alerts should be displayed at the point when a decision is being made, rather than jumping on the physician later.

The paper offers a great deal of additional information, and if you’re at all involved in addressing alerting issues or designing the alerts I strongly suggest you review the entire paper.

But even the excerpts above offer a lot to consider. If most alerts met these usability and presentation standards, they might offer more value to clinicians and greater safety to patients.

Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Investment Model

Posted on I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

Overview

Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) are groups of doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers, who come together voluntarily to provide coordinated, high-quality care to their Medicare patients to help them deliver better care at lower cost.

The goal of coordinated care is to ensure that patients, especially people with chronic conditions, get the right care at the right time, while avoiding unnecessary duplication of services and preventing medical errors.

ACOs represent one part of a comprehensive series of initiatives in the Affordable Care Act that are designed to lower costs and improve care. When an ACO succeeds in both delivering high-quality care and spending health care dollars more wisely, it will share in the savings it achieves for the Medicare program.

Medicare currently offers or is planning to offer several ACO initiatives:

  • Medicare Shared Savings Program
  • Pioneer ACO Model
  • Next Generation ACO Model
  • Advance Payment ACO Model
  • Comprehensive End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Care Initiative

This fact sheet provides a general description of the ACO Investment Model, a new ACO model being offered to support the Medicare Shared Savings Program ACOs.

Summary of the ACO Investment Model

The ACO Investment Model is an initiative developed by the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation (Innovation Center) for organizations participating as ACOs in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (Shared Savings Program). The ACO Investment Model is a new model of pre-paid shared savings that builds on experience with the Advance Payment Model to encourage new ACOs to form in rural and underserved areas and current Medicare Shared Savings Program ACOs to transition to arrangements with greater financial risk.

The ACO Investment Model will be available to:

1) New Shared Savings Program ACOs that joined in 2015 or are joining in 2016. The ACO Investment Model seeks to encourage uptake of coordinated, accountable care in rural geographies and areas where there has been little ACO activity, by offering pre-payment of shared savings in both upfront and ongoing per beneficiary per month payments. CMS believes that encouraging participation in areas of low ACO penetration may spur new markets to focus on improving care outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries.

2) ACOs that joined the Shared Savings Program starting in 2012, 2013 or 2014. Here, the ACO Investment Model will help ACOs succeed in the Shared Savings Program and encourage progression to higher levels of financial risk, ultimately improving care for beneficiaries and generating Medicare savings.

Background

CMS is encouraging providers to participate in ACOs through the Medicare Shared Savings Program, which creates financial incentives for ACOs that lower growth in health care costs while meeting performance standards on quality of care and putting Medicare beneficiaries first.

The Innovation Center

The Innovation Center was created by the Affordable Care Act to test innovative payment and service delivery models to reduce program expenditures while preserving or enhancing the quality of care. It is committed to transforming the Medicare, Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Programs and is expected to help deliver better care for individuals, better health for populations, and lower growth in expenditures for Medicare, Medicaid and CHIP beneficiaries.

Working in concert with the Shared Savings Program, the Innovation Center is testing the ACO Investment Model and the Pioneer ACO Model, and has sponsored learning activities that help providers form ACOs and improve their results.  More information on all of these initiatives is available on the Innovation Center website at http://innovation.cms.gov.

The ACO Investment Model was developed in response to concerns and available research suggesting that some providers lack adequate access to the capital needed to invest in infrastructure necessary to successfully implement population care management.

Structure of Payments

New ACOs

Under the ACO Investment Model, ACOs that will begin participating in the Medicare Shared Savings Program on January 1, 2015 or January 1, 2016 will receive three types of payments:

  • An upfront, fixed payment:  Each ACO receives a fixed payment.
  • An upfront, variable payment:  Each ACO receives a payment based on the number of its preliminarily prospectively-assigned beneficiaries.
  • A monthly payment of varying amount depending on the size of the ACO:  Each ACO receives a monthly payment based on the number of its preliminarily prospectively-assigned beneficiaries.

The structure of these payments addresses both the fixed and variable costs associated with forming an ACO.

Existing ACOs

Under the ACO Investment Model, ACOs that began participating in the Medicare Shared Savings Program on April 1, 2012, July 1, 2012, January 1, 2013, or January 1, 2014 will receive two types of payments:

  • An upfront, variable payment:  Each ACO receives a payment based on the number of its preliminarily prospectively-assigned beneficiaries.
  • A monthly payment of varying amount depending on the size of the ACO:  Each ACO receives a monthly payment based on the number of its preliminarily prospectively-assigned beneficiaries.

The structure of these payments addresses both the fixed and variable costs associated with making ongoing investments to improve care coordination for existing ACOs.

Recovery of ACO Investment Model Payments

For ACOs already participating in the Shared Savings Program, CMS will recover the ACO Investment Model payments through an offset of an ACO’s earned shared savings. ACOs selected to receive ACO Investment Model payments will enter into an agreement with CMS that details the obligation to repay ACO Investment Model payments.

If the ACO does not generate sufficient savings to repay the ACO Investment Model payments as of the first settlement for the Shared Savings Program, CMS will continue to offset shared savings in subsequent performance years and any future agreement periods, or pursue recovery where appropriate.

For ACOs new to the Shared Savings Program in 2015 and 2016, CMS will recover payments from earned shared savings for as long as the participant remains in the Shared Savings Program ACO. CMS will pursue full recovery of pre-paid shared savings from any ACO that does not complete its initial Shared Savings Program agreement period or the full term of the ACO Investment Model agreement.

Eligibility/Selection

The ACO Investment Model is expected to help provide support to organizations whose ability to invest in infrastructure and redesigned care processes would be improved with additional access to capital.

In order to be eligible for the ACO Investment Model, an ACO already participating in the Shared Savings Program must meet the following criteria:

1) The ACO must be accepted into and participate in the Shared Savings Program. The ACO’s first performance period in the Medicare Shared Savings Program must have started in 2012, 2013, 2014, or 2015 or will start in 2016.

2) If the ACO started in the Medicare Shared Savings Program in 2012, 2013 or 2014, it has completely and accurately reported quality measures to the Medicare Shared Savings Program in the most recent performance year, excluding ACOs that started in 2015 or that will start in 2016.

3) The ACO has a preliminary prospective beneficiary assignment of 10,000 or fewer beneficiaries for the most recent quarter, as determined in accordance with the Shared Savings Program regulations.  However, ACOs that started the Medicare Shared Savings Program in 2015 or will start in 2016, and are determined to be from a rural area using the application selection criteria, are permitted to exceed the 10,000 beneficiary assignment limit.

4) The ACO does not include a hospital as an ACO participant or an ACO provider/supplier (as defined by the Shared Savings Program regulations), unless the hospital is a critical access hospital (CAH) or inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) hospital with 100 or fewer beds.

5) The ACO is not owned or operated in whole or in part by a health plan.

6) The ACO did not participate in the Advance Payment Model.

During the selection process, the ACO Investment Model will target new ACOs serving rural areas, areas of low ACO penetration, and existing ACOs committed to moving to higher risk tracks. CMS will also give preference to ACOs that provide high quality of care, achieved their financial benchmark, and demonstrate exceptional financial need.

Application Process

The application period for ACOs that started in 2014 and 2015 — or will start in 2016 — will open July 1st, 2015 and close July 31, 2015.

CMS staff will review applications for the applicant organization’s ability to meet criteria identified in the solicitation. All applicants are also required to be accepted into the Shared Savings Program, in accordance with program rules.

Participants

In the first round of applications for ACOs that started in the Medicare Shared Savings Program in 2012 and 2013, the ACO Investment Model has accepted six ACOs into the model.

Additional Resources

More information about the ACO Investment Model, including the Request for Application, is available on the Innovation Center website at http://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/ACO-Investment-Model/.  Any questions about the program can be directed to AIM@cms.hhs.gov

For information about the Shared Savings Program, please see: www.cms.hhs.gov/sharedsavingsprogram/.

CMS Blog:   http://blog.cms.gov/2015/06/25/affordable-care-act-initiative-supports-care-coordination-in-rural-areas/

Doctors, Not Patients, May Be Holding Back mHealth Adoption

Posted on June 24, 2015 I Written By

Anne Zieger is veteran healthcare consultant and analyst with 20 years of industry experience. Zieger formerly served as editor-in-chief of FierceHealthcare.com and her commentaries have appeared in dozens of international business publications, including Forbes, Business Week and Information Week. She has also contributed content to hundreds of healthcare and health IT organizations, including several Fortune 500 companies. Contact her at @ziegerhealth on Twitter or visit her site at Zieger Healthcare.

Clearly, mHealth technology has achieved impressive momentum among a certain breed of health-conscious, self-monitoring consumer. Still, aside from wearable health bands, few mHealth technologies or apps have achieved a critical level of adoption.

The reason for this, according to a new survey, may lie in doctors’ attitudes toward these tools. According to the study, by market research firm MedPanel, only 15% of physicians are suggesting wearables or health apps as approaches for growing healthier.

It’s not that the tools themselves aren’t useful. According to a separate study by Research Now summarized by HealthData Management, 86% of 500 medical professionals said mHealth apps gave them a better understanding of a patient’s medical condition, and 76% said that they felt that apps were helping patients manage chronic illnesses. Also, HDM reported that 46% believed that apps could make patient transitions from hospital to home care simpler.

While doctors could do more to promote the use of mHealth technology — and patients might benefit if they did — the onus is not completely on doctors. MedPanel president Jason LaBonte told HDM that vendors are positioning wearables and apps as “a fad” by seeing them as solely consumer-driven markets. (Not only does this turn doctors off, it also makes it less likely that consumers would think of asking their doctor about mHealth tool usage, I’d submit.)

But doctors aren’t just concerned about mHealth’s image. They also aren’t satisfied with current products, though that would change rapidly if there were a way to integrate mobile health data into EMR platforms directly. Sure, platforms like HealthKit exist, but it seems like doctors want something more immediate and simple.

Doctors also told MedPanel that mHealth devices need to be easier to use and generate data that has greater use in clinical practice.  Moreover, physicians wanted to see these products generate data that could help them meet practice manager and payer requirements, something that few if any of the current roster of mHealth tools can do (to my knowledge).

When it comes to physician awareness of specific products, only a few seem to have stood out from the crowd. MedPanel found that while 82% of doctors surveyed were aware of the Apple Watch, even more were familiar with Fitbit.

Meanwhile, the Microsoft Band scored highest of all wearables for satisfaction with ease of use and generating useful data. Given the fluid state of physicians’ loyalties in this area, Microsoft may not be able to maintain its lead, but it is interesting that it won out this time over usability champ Apple.

We’re Hosting the #KareoChat and Discussing Value Based Care and ACOs – Join Us!

Posted on June 23, 2015 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

ACO and Value Based Reimbursement Twitter Chat
We’re excited to be hosting this week’s #KareoChat on Thursday, 6/25 at 9 AM PT (Noon ET) where we’ll be diving into the details around Value Based Care and ACOs. We’ll be hosting the chat from @ehrandhit and chiming in on occasion from @techguy and @healthcarescene as well.

The topic of value based care and ACOs is extremely important to small practice physicians since understanding and participating in it will be key to their survival. At least that’s my take. I look forward to hearing other people’s thoughts on these changes on Thursday’s Twitter chat. Here are the questions we’ll be discussing over the hour:

  1. What’s the latest trends in value based reimbursement that we should know or watch? #KareoChat
  2. Why or why aren’t you participating in an ACO? #KareoChat
  3. Describe the pros and cons you see with the change to value based reimbursement. #KareoChat
  4. What are you doing to prepare your practice for value based reimbursement and ACOs? #KareoChat
  5. Which technologies and applications will we need in a value based reimbursement and ACO world? #KareoChat
  6. What’s the role of small practices in a value based reimbursement world? Can they survive? #KareoChat

For those of you not familiar with a Twitter chat, you can follow the discussion on Twitter by watching the hashtag #KareoChat. You can also take part in the Twitter chat by including the #KareoChat hashtag in any tweets you send.

I look forward to “seeing” and learning from many of you on Twitter on Thursday. Feel free to start the conversation in the comments below as well.

Full Disclosure: Kareo is a sponsor of EMR and EHR.

Do We Want a Relationship With Our Doctor?

Posted on June 22, 2015 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

As is often the case, this weekend I was browsing Twitter. Many of the people and hashtags I follow are healthcare and health IT related. Many of the tweets related to the need to change the healthcare system. You know the usual themes: We pay too much for healthcare. We deserve better quality healthcare. We need to change the current healthcare system to be focused on the patient. Etc etc etc.

This wave of tweets ended with one that said “It’s all about the relationships.” I actually think the tweet had more to do with how a company was run, but in the beautiful world of Twitter you get to mesh ideas from multiple disciplines in the same Twitter stream (assuming you follow a good mix of people). I took the tweet and asked the question, “Do We Want a Relationship With Our Doctor?

If you’d asked me a year ago, I would have said, no! Why would I want a relationship with my doctor? I don’t want any relationship with my doctor, because that means that I’m sick and need him to fix something that’s wrong with me. I hope to never see my doctor. Doctor = Bad. Don’t even get me started with hospitals. If Doctor = Bad then Hospital > Doctor.

I’m personally still battling through a change in mindset. It’s not an easy change. It’s really hard to change culture. We have a hard core culture in America of healthcare being sick care. We all want to be healthy, but none of us want to be sick. Going to the doctor admits that we are sick and we don’t want anything to do with that. If we have an actual relationship with our doctor, then we must be really sick.

From the other perspective, do doctors want relationships with their patients? I’ve met some really jaded doctors who probably don’t, but most of the doctors I’ve met would love an actual, deep relationship with their patients. However, they all are asking the question, “How?” They still have to pay the bills, pay off their debts, etc. I don’t know many doctors who have reconciled these practical needs with the desire to have a relationship with their patients.

The closest I’ve seen is the direct primary care and concierge models. It’s still not clear to me that these options will scale across healthcare. Plus, what’s the solution for specialists? Will ACOs and Value Based Reimbursement get us there. I hear a lot of talk in this regard which scares me. Lots of talk without a clear path to results really scares me in healthcare.

What do you think? Do you want a relationship with your doctor? Do doctors want a relationship with their patients? What’s the path to making this a practical reality? Are you already practicing medicine where you have a deep, meaningful relationship with your patient? We’d love to hear your experience.

A 6 Step Guide to Succeeding as an ACO

Posted on June 18, 2015 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

Farzad Mostashari’s company, Aledade, raising $30 million is a good sign that healthcare organizations are going to be spending a lot of time and money figuring out these new ACO and value based reimbursement models. If you’re a healthcare organization that hasn’t started learning about ACOs, here’s a good whitepaper to start.

The whitepaper is titled “Succeeding as an ACO: A 6-Step Guide for Health Care Organizations” and does a lot more than just talk about the 6 steps to building an ACO. It covers ACO in a pretty thorough way. However, the 6 steps are pretty valuable as well:

1. Understand Your Costs
2. Reduce Out-Migration from Your Network
3. Maximize Pay-for-Performance Reimbursement
4. Identify Early Opportunities for Utilization Reductions
5. Support Chronic Care and Disease Management
6. Predict Who Will Develop Issues

Is your healthcare organization ready for the changing reimbursement model and ACOs? If you’re not sure, read through this FREE whitepaper and you’ll have a better idea of what’s happening and how you want to position yourself and your organization in this changing reimbursement environment.